Lecture 2A | MIT 6.001 Structure and Interpretation, 1986
Higher-order Procedures Despite the copyright notice on the screen, this course is now offered under a Creative Commons license: BY-NC-SA. Details at http://ocw.mit.edu/terms Subtitles for this course are provided through the generous assistance of Henry Baker, Hoofar Pourzand, Heather Wood, Aleksejs Truhans, Steven Edwards, George Menhorn, and Mahendra Kumar.Category: Education
Author: MIT
Published (on YouTube): 2009-04-08
Published (here): 2012-05-23
Rating: 4.924528; Votes:53
Views: 24029; Favorites: 97
Video duration: 62 min.
«Lecture 2A | MIT 6.0...» screenshots:
00:30:40
|
00:15:20
|
00:30:40
|
00:46:00
|
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
Comments on «Lecture 2A | MIT 6.001 Structure and Interpretation, 1986»:
louisbrassyyy on 2012-03-07
NO experience is ...
NO experience is necessary. There's no inventory to buy. You can work part- or full-time, as you choose. For about the same cost as a tank of gas, you can be in business in minutes and earning more than you dreamed of in days. [ goo.gl\RXIRC]
NewKeepSharing31 on 2012-02-19
keep spirit MIT :D
keep spirit MIT :D
victorldf100 on 2012-01-16
Mulher Dinossauro ...
Mulher Dinossauro Dá a Luz a um Bebê Adulto Procurem no youtube por: "Gigante Dá a Luz"
YouDabian on 2012-01-14
It seems like ...
It seems like you're right there. I think the definition is wrong, instead of: (define (sum term a next) ... It probably should have been: (define (sum term a next b) ... Like the recursive version.
pjojin0 on 2012-01-13
Thanks for the ...
Thanks for the great video
TheSanovita on 2012-01-13
Very awesome
Very awesome
MyDavidsun on 2012-01-13
awesome
awesome
andreeaweed on 2012-01-13
thanks for the ...
thanks for the video!!
YouDabian on 2012-01-13
Just like a, which ...
Just like a, which is not assigned a value either, Its a formal parameter of sum. It will be difined when you call sum. For instance: (sum-int 1 5) will evaluate to 1+2+3+4+5 == 15. (In this case, a will be 1 and b will be 5).
iateyourgranny on 2012-01-13
uh-huh, and where ...
uh-huh, and where is its value defined?
YouDabian on 2012-01-12
*upper
*upper
YouDabian on 2012-01-12
"b" is the ubber ...
"b" is the ubber bound, its just a number.
iateyourgranny on 2012-01-01
but b wasn't ...
but b wasn't defined in the iterative implementation of SUM, or was it?
ngeliatduit on 2011-12-28
Mantap, Good Video ...
Mantap, Good Video!!
karimfaidh on 2011-12-16
It's great
It's great
Flusercom on 2011-12-15
good video, very ...
good video, very informative
Spasatcom on 2011-12-15
Nice video Thumb up
Nice video Thumb up
DroidooNetwork on 2011-12-05
It's funny to see ...
It's funny to see just how little has changed since 1986 to present time as far as general structure goes.
felipecotti on 2011-11-02
I absolutely love ...
I absolutely love how that last dude, after being answered by The Sussman, enters in a deep, deep meditation as the camera zooms off. He is totally immersed in the universe, and the universe is becoming one with him; he had a glimpse of reaching Satori.
DovletTatlok on 2011-10-23
Thumb up if you ...
Thumb up if you see a bug in the listing at 19:00
eatme690808 on 2011-08-23
You can sudo apt- ...
You can sudo apt-get install mit-scheme from a Ubuntu related distro and it works perfectly. That interpreter should be available on many flavors or Linux.
eatme690808 on 2011-08-23
Thank you MIT for ...
Thank you MIT for posting such quality material. Even though this is 25 years old, going over this material is still incredibly illuminating.
KillaHaakon on 2009-12-13
Heathen! Emacs ...
Heathen! Emacs is superior! :p Anyway, thanks for clearing this up, I can now Scheme happily. If you like the Lisp syntax, and want to check out other interesting languages, I highly recommend Prolog. The SWI-Prolog is free software, and can be found on their webpage.
oakenshield1 on 2009-12-09
The code shown in ...
The code shown in these videos perfectly run on MIT Scheme. This is Scheme dialect of Lisp not Common Lisp.
KillaHaakon on 2009-12-04
Did tcrayford's ...
Did tcrayford's suggestion work? So far I've just used prolog, and I'd like to use LISP, as they aren't really the same at all. (They have similar syntax though)