The Inherent Design Flaws In The "Resource Based Economy" Model
This is a video response to Peter Joseph's reply to Stephan Molyneux on his Review of Zeitgeist moving forward. In this video I establish that the official Resource Based Economy has numerous very real, and legitimate problems. Those problems are not minor details that can be glossed over or fixed at a later date, they are in fact inherent design flaws which render it unworkable. Peter Joseph's video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozy52bZ6JTw Stephan's video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pg5K07c72Tw My earlier challenges to Peter Joseph: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRt6IvZIG3U and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUVYevaXKT4Category: Nonprofit
Author: StormCloudsGathering
Published (on YouTube): 2011-02-02
Published (here): 2012-05-28
Rating: 3.6170213; Votes:376
Views: 8083; Favorites: 47
Video duration: 6 min.
«The Inherent Design ...» screenshots:
00:02:42
|
00:01:21
|
00:02:42
|
00:04:03
|
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
Comments on «The Inherent Design Flaws In The "Resource Based Economy" Model»:
Zoarial92 on 2012-05-17
Hard proof or, as ...
Hard proof or, as they say here on the internets, gtfo. There has never been a true RBE put into practice, maybe similar models that share some attributes but never any with the same end goal in mind
chrisglinel on 2012-05-15
Dictatorship is the ...
Dictatorship is the solution!!! With a dictator that steps down when stability is achieved. You then create laws or imbed something into the computers algorythm that prevents sole control (In other words: long-term anti-corruption mesures)
Zoarial92 on 2012-05-17
Hard proof or, as ...
Hard proof or, as they say here on the internets, gtfo. There has never been a true RBE put into practice, maybe similar models that share some attributes but never any with the same end goal in mind
chrisglinel on 2012-05-15
Dictatorship is the ...
Dictatorship is the solution!!! With a dictator that steps down when stability is achieved. You then create laws or imbed something into the computers algorythm that prevents sole control (In other words: long-term anti-corruption mesures)
headmaniac1 on 2012-05-10
You might google it ...
You might google it and keep an eye to the ground.... Try Freedom Reigns com
TheMichelWay on 2012-05-10
sorry, but who's ...
sorry, but who's Drake? Never heard of it.
headmaniac1 on 2012-05-09
If you listened to ...
If you listened to what Drake is saying, you can have RBE right now. Just go help a neighbor or plant a garden and share some with your neighbors or family. Have you ever heard of the 100th monkey?
headmaniac1 on 2012-05-09
RBE communities ...
RBE communities exist all over the world and are documented right here on YT.
headmaniac1 on 2012-05-09
RBE is not about ...
RBE is not about big buildings, it's about streamlining production thru technology. RBE is about helping each other out, rather than expecting something back. RBE is about taking responsibility. Money and corporations are not humanitie's friend. We cannot solve a problem with the same thinking that created it in the first place. - Einstein RBE is already happening in communities around the country. We don't need to reinvent anything.
TheMichelWay on 2012-05-08
Very intelligent. ...
Very intelligent. Personally, I am a pro-free-market-against-government guy, but I would like to see a world that people lived in a society they wanted to live in. Many, like me, belive that capitalism is the best option, but many believe it's socialism, many that the RBE is the one. Well, the thing is, as Peter stated in his response to Stefan, it's a world planning, so EVERYONE should agree to that. That's a bit too much imo, and I hope they aren't thinking of forcing people to agree.
Chewbacca651 on 2012-05-06
Having spoken to ...
Having spoken to several people over the last few months, I realise that the main problem for most is a problem of conditioned or indoctrinated thought; some people just struggle with the Idea of a society without money let alone who runs the super computer that controls the distribution of resources. I believe the same applies to the lack of positive solutions to the so called flaws in the proposal we r conditioned to criticise not to offer positive solutions watch THE AWAKENING Maxwell Igan
UrbanLifeandEconomy on 2012-04-21
Hi, did you people ...
Hi, did you people looked at "Earth Exchange based Economy". It is a new concept of economy where all the people work free of cost and all the organizations are noprofit organizations. It does have a concept of money and it is not similar to Resoure based economy.
KawallaBair on 2012-04-16
I'd just like to ...
I'd just like to make a point about the supercomputer infrastructure and who gets to control it. I would like to direct your attention to the open source initiative which has produced a large amount of software which is often better than the commercial software which it wishes to immitate. By making the supercomputer infrastructure open source you allow ANYONE to make adjustments at any time, and any issues which arise from misuse of this are rectified by someone else.
skatejam7 on 2012-04-11
Nothing like a ...
Nothing like a resource based economy has ever been tried before :S
Kukainis on 2012-04-11
everyone knows we ...
everyone knows we are unsustainable, it's just that I don't believe a centralized resource allocation will resolve this. It's been tried already many times in the past and has failed.
skatejam7 on 2012-04-11
Both Peter and ...
Both Peter and Jacque have said a few times in interviews etc that you don't have to call it a resource based economy or the venus project but they want people to acknowledge how unsustainable we are as a society today.
skatejam7 on 2012-04-11
Both Peter and ...
Both Peter and Jacque have said a few times in interviews etc that you don't have to call it a resource based economy or the venus project but they want people to acknowledge how unsustainable we are as a society today.
skatejam7 on 2012-04-11
Both Peter and ...
Both Peter and Jacque have said a few times in interviews etc that you don't have to call it a resource based economy or the venus project but they want people to acknowledge how unsustainable we are as a society today.
Kukainis on 2012-04-10
none of these good ...
none of these good intentions matter if Peter and Jacque don't address the problems their economical movement has. You can't build a new type of economic and social structure if all you introduce is centralized "my way or highway" approach to it. It's doomed to fail even before it's been tried. Violence will only bring more violence...
skatejam7 on 2012-04-06
equal purchasing ...
equal purchasing power for all.
skatejam7 on 2012-04-06
He doesn't have the ...
He doesn't have the one and only way, but he's supporting the one and only way that's been put forward for a society that tries to stop harming the planet and the people on it as much as possible. To my knowledge, no other system attempts this. Both Peter and Jacque have said a few times in interviews etc that you don't have to call it a resource based economy or the venus project but they want people to acknowledge how unsustainable we are as a society today. We need dynamic equilibrium and...
YaHuWaHservant on 2012-04-01
I made a video ...
I made a video whereby I ask, as well as explain, questions/problems I have with TVP which I feel need to be solved before critical thinkers/skeptics join. In it I explain preference: /watch?v=Dq_wfi1tBJg
R2BCH2 on 2012-04-01
What do you mean by ...
What do you mean by "preferences". To eat or to fast? To have shelter or to sleep rough? To have the highest quality, highly sustainable products or stuff that breaks down after a short time (like in our current system)? The preference is very obvious here. I've been through these discussions x times. You might want to go back a few pages on this video. You'll also find my comments on other RBE related videos. I won't type all that again.
YaHuWaHservant on 2012-04-01
you cant begin ...
you cant begin assigning things until you know human preferences, you don;t know human preferences until you have the debate. This is why you cannot simply asses parameters until you finish the initial discussion. The only question is not that but how do we find the margin for error without a price system? Doorknob+fork=nothing. You have to quantify resources, production, etc then find a way to give the consumer a chance to weigh in on their preferences individually which without price is impos.
R2BCH2 on 2012-03-31
"hungry/without ...
"hungry/without shelter/unclothed" Why would that be a valid assumption? All resource parameters have to be assessed up front before even starting to design whatever it is. The only question is how large of an error margin can be allowed to never jeopardise human needs.